PHAGE-ANTIBIOTIC COMBINATIONS AGAINST KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE: IMPACT OF METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES ON EFFECT EVALUATION

Phage-antibiotic combinations against Klebsiella pneumoniae: impact of methodological approaches on effect evaluation

Phage-antibiotic combinations against Klebsiella pneumoniae: impact of methodological approaches on effect evaluation

Blog Article

BackgroundThe combined use of bacteriophages and antibiotics represents a promising strategy for combating multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens.However, the lack of uniformity in methods for assessing combination effects and experimental protocols has resulted in inconsistent findings across studies.This study aimed to evaluate the effects of interactions between phages and antibiotics on Klebsiella pneumoniae strains using various statistical approaches to formalize combination effects.MethodsEffects were assessed for four antibiotics from distinct classes (gentamicin, levofloxacin, meropenem, chloramphenicol), three phages from different genera (Dlv622, Seu621, FRZ284), and a depolymerase (Dep622) on three K.pneumoniae strains of the KL23 capsule type.

Antibiotics were used at Cmax concentrations, and phages at 30x24x24 wall cabinet sublethal levels.A modified t-test, Bliss independence model, two-way ANOVA, and checkerboard assay were employed to evaluate the results.ResultsAmong 48 combinations, 33 effects were statistically significant, including 26 cases of synergy and 7 of antagonism.All statistical methods showed consistency in identifying effects; however, the t-test and Bliss method detected a greater number of effects.The strongest synergy was soderhamn ottoman cover observed with levofloxacin in combination with Seu621 or Dep622 across all bacterial strains.

Checkerboard assays confirmed synergy in selected cases but indicated that combined effects could vary with antimicrobial concentrations.ConclusionThe choice of analytical method substantially impacts the detection of phage-antibiotic effects.The t-test and Bliss method, due to their simplicity and sensitivity, may be optimal for clinical application, while two-way ANOVA for confirming strong interactions.These results emphasize the need to consider interaction characteristics when designing therapeutic strategies.

Report this page